Atlas · skill

Deep Research Agents

Deep research agents investigate a question through repeated searching, source inspection and synthesis. They maintain a research objective across multiple steps, follow evidence gaps and assemble an answer whose claims can be traced to consulted sources, with explicit boundaries on scope, time and accessible information.

conceptAgent Applications

What it is

The architecture combines a planning or decision loop with tools for finding and reading information. Rather than retrieving one fixed batch of passages, the agent can compare sources, refine a query and investigate a contradiction before drafting. A research state may record subquestions, extracted evidence, provenance and unresolved claims. The label describes a task pattern, not a guarantee of exhaustive coverage or a particular model. It differs from ordinary retrieval-augmented answering in the duration and adaptability of evidence gathering. Research quality depends on source selection and faithful synthesis as well as the ability to navigate tools.

What the work involves

The practitioner specifies the question, time range, acceptable sources and expected deliverable before execution. Search results are leads; important claims require inspecting the underlying material. Evidence records should preserve URLs, dates and the passages supporting an interpretation. Coverage checks identify unanswered subquestions and competing explanations. A useful output is a referenced report with a clear distinction between established findings, inference and missing information. Resource budgets prevent an open-ended search from continuing merely because additional pages are available.

Illustrative example

A researcher asks which technical changes are required to move a service between two storage APIs. The agent examines each provider's official documentation, follows links to authentication and consistency details and builds a comparison organized around the service's operations. It revisits an ambiguous deletion behavior instead of assuming both APIs match. The report links each material difference to its source and flags the behavior that still needs an integration test.

Limits and common mistakes

Repeated search can amplify a poor initial framing, and multiple pages may repeat the same unsupported claim. Citations can be present while failing to support the adjacent sentence. Agents may mistake outdated documentation for current behavior or infer completeness from a long report. Quality checks therefore examine source authority, recency, claim support and coverage of the actual question. A research agent cannot establish facts hidden behind inaccessible evidence, and should identify that boundary rather than fabricate a conclusion.

Prerequisites

Sources and further reading

Last updated: 2026-10-10